For example, here's Ramanujan's sum for Π which, after just 3 terms, overwhelms IEEE 754 double precision. Modern discoveries, like spigot algorithms on non-decimal bases, can find a given individual digit in constant time. But for fully expanding Π, no one has surpassed Ramanujan's expression: both the Chudnovsky brothers and Yasumasa Kanada adapted it to achieve their milestone calculations.
Thursday, May 31, 2018
ramanujan's Π summation
Monday, March 6, 2017
butterfly curve

One application I thought of for this is object motion in games: I tried it out by writing this little Canvas game, where the comets follow the curve's trajectory. The differences in plot density along the curve create natural-looking comet tails.
Friday, February 24, 2017
bézier curves

Wednesday, February 15, 2017
more Π obscurantism
But as you can see from the comment, the series converges very slowly!
Monday, March 28, 2016
today in oblique approaches
Saturday, February 13, 2016
hénon attractor

Tuesday, December 22, 2015
lyapunov fractals

Wednesday, July 8, 2015
sqrt 2, visualized

The program makes for an interesting screensaver, but does it follow any pattern, or illustrate any special properties of √2 ? Though I'm no mathematician, from what I've read this seems unlikely. √2 is suspected (but not proved) to be a normal number. This would mean the digits of its expansion (respective to some number base) follow a uniform distribution; no digit would be more likely to appear than any other.
Nonetheless, I'd be curious to see the results of a really long run!